WEBVTT Kind: captions Language: en Style: ::cue(c.colorCCCCCC) { color: rgb(204,204,204); } ::cue(c.colorE5E5E5) { color: rgb(229,229,229); } ## 00:00:01.560 --> 00:00:07.780 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:00:07.780 --> 00:00:07.790 align:start position:0% [Music] 00:00:07.790 --> 00:00:11.150 align:start position:0% [Music] hello<00:00:08.790> welcome<00:00:09.360> to<00:00:09.780> another<00:00:10.019> edition<00:00:10.679> of<00:00:10.710> the 00:00:11.150 --> 00:00:11.160 align:start position:0% hello welcome to another edition of the 00:00:11.160 --> 00:00:12.709 align:start position:0% hello welcome to another edition of the ers<00:00:11.759> highlights 00:00:12.709 --> 00:00:12.719 align:start position:0% ers highlights 00:00:12.719 --> 00:00:14.780 align:start position:0% ers highlights I'm<00:00:13.110> Paul<00:00:13.410> Jones<00:00:13.650> I'm<00:00:13.950> a<00:00:14.009> global<00:00:14.280> medical 00:00:14.780 --> 00:00:14.790 align:start position:0% I'm Paul Jones I'm a global medical 00:00:14.790 --> 00:00:17.029 align:start position:0% I'm Paul Jones I'm a global medical expert<00:00:15.210> with<00:00:15.389> GSK<00:00:15.929> and<00:00:16.139> an<00:00:16.650> emeritus 00:00:17.029 --> 00:00:17.039 align:start position:0% expert with GSK and an emeritus 00:00:17.039 --> 00:00:19.640 align:start position:0% expert with GSK and an emeritus professor<00:00:17.220> of<00:00:17.760> respiratory<00:00:18.240> medicine<00:00:18.650> some 00:00:19.640 --> 00:00:19.650 align:start position:0% professor of respiratory medicine some 00:00:19.650 --> 00:00:22.220 align:start position:0% professor of respiratory medicine some George's<00:00:20.130> in<00:00:20.279> London<00:00:20.670> and<00:00:21.029> I'm<00:00:21.480> delighted<00:00:21.960> to 00:00:22.220 --> 00:00:22.230 align:start position:0% George's in London and I'm delighted to 00:00:22.230 --> 00:00:23.990 align:start position:0% George's in London and I'm delighted to be<00:00:22.439> joined<00:00:22.740> for<00:00:22.859> my<00:00:23.100> friend<00:00:23.460> and<00:00:23.730> colleague 00:00:23.990 --> 00:00:24.000 align:start position:0% be joined for my friend and colleague 00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:27.410 align:start position:0% be joined for my friend and colleague professor<00:00:24.720> Jurgen<00:00:25.439> Vespa<00:00:25.890> past<00:00:26.640> president<00:00:27.269> of 00:00:27.410 --> 00:00:27.420 align:start position:0% professor Jurgen Vespa past president of 00:00:27.420 --> 00:00:30.349 align:start position:0% professor Jurgen Vespa past president of the<00:00:27.660> ARS<00:00:28.140> and<00:00:28.380> also<00:00:29.220> a<00:00:29.250> very<00:00:29.670> significant 00:00:30.349 --> 00:00:30.359 align:start position:0% the ARS and also a very significant 00:00:30.359 --> 00:00:33.680 align:start position:0% the ARS and also a very significant member<00:00:30.720> of<00:00:30.869> God<00:00:31.309> we<00:00:32.309> were<00:00:32.489> at<00:00:32.700> a<00:00:32.730> session<00:00:33.239> about 00:00:33.680 --> 00:00:33.690 align:start position:0% member of God we were at a session about 00:00:33.690 --> 00:00:37.490 align:start position:0% member of God we were at a session about lung<00:00:34.020> function<00:00:34.500> testing<00:00:34.980> that<00:00:36.170> rehashed<00:00:37.170> some 00:00:37.490 --> 00:00:37.500 align:start position:0% lung function testing that rehashed some 00:00:37.500 --> 00:00:39.290 align:start position:0% lung function testing that rehashed some of<00:00:37.620> the<00:00:37.710> older<00:00:38.100> data<00:00:38.280> and<00:00:38.640> challenged<00:00:39.120> us<00:00:39.270> to 00:00:39.290 --> 00:00:39.300 align:start position:0% of the older data and challenged us to 00:00:39.300 --> 00:00:42.729 align:start position:0% of the older data and challenged us to think<00:00:39.510> about<00:00:40.260> new<00:00:41.010> types<00:00:41.550> of<00:00:41.790> investigations 00:00:42.729 --> 00:00:42.739 align:start position:0% think about new types of investigations 00:00:42.739 --> 00:00:45.049 align:start position:0% think about new types of investigations so<00:00:43.739> you're<00:00:44.070> there<00:00:44.250> what's<00:00:44.670> your<00:00:44.820> overall 00:00:45.049 --> 00:00:45.059 align:start position:0% so you're there what's your overall 00:00:45.059 --> 00:00:47.959 align:start position:0% so you're there what's your overall impression<00:00:45.989> of<00:00:46.200> that<00:00:46.440> session<00:00:46.890> I<00:00:47.309> think<00:00:47.640> first 00:00:47.959 --> 00:00:47.969 align:start position:0% impression of that session I think first 00:00:47.969 --> 00:00:49.610 align:start position:0% impression of that session I think first of<00:00:48.059> all<00:00:48.120> it<00:00:48.360> was<00:00:48.450> a<00:00:48.539> lively<00:00:48.960> session<00:00:49.140> because 00:00:49.610 --> 00:00:49.620 align:start position:0% of all it was a lively session because 00:00:49.620 --> 00:00:51.200 align:start position:0% of all it was a lively session because it<00:00:49.770> was<00:00:49.890> a<00:00:49.920> pro/con<00:00:50.399> debate<00:00:50.789> on<00:00:51.000> three 00:00:51.200 --> 00:00:51.210 align:start position:0% it was a pro/con debate on three 00:00:51.210 --> 00:00:53.090 align:start position:0% it was a pro/con debate on three different<00:00:51.600> areas<00:00:51.750> and<00:00:52.170> I<00:00:52.199> think<00:00:52.230> that<00:00:52.559> heats 00:00:53.090 --> 00:00:53.100 align:start position:0% different areas and I think that heats 00:00:53.100 --> 00:00:55.069 align:start position:0% different areas and I think that heats up<00:00:53.370> the<00:00:53.579> atmosphere<00:00:53.730> a<00:00:54.149> little<00:00:54.329> and<00:00:54.660> people 00:00:55.069 --> 00:00:55.079 align:start position:0% up the atmosphere a little and people 00:00:55.079 --> 00:00:57.319 align:start position:0% up the atmosphere a little and people get<00:00:55.770> a<00:00:55.800> sort<00:00:56.039> of<00:00:56.070> a<00:00:56.309> bit<00:00:56.520> more<00:00:56.550> aggressive 00:00:57.319 --> 00:00:57.329 align:start position:0% get a sort of a bit more aggressive 00:00:57.329 --> 00:00:59.510 align:start position:0% get a sort of a bit more aggressive perhaps<00:00:57.600> and<00:00:57.870> it<00:00:58.020> was<00:00:58.230> good<00:00:58.469> I<00:00:58.680> think<00:00:59.309> it<00:00:59.399> was 00:00:59.510 --> 00:00:59.520 align:start position:0% perhaps and it was good I think it was 00:00:59.520 --> 00:01:02.119 align:start position:0% perhaps and it was good I think it was highly<00:00:59.820> relevant<00:01:00.120> because<00:01:00.780> I<00:01:00.809> think<00:01:01.199> first<00:01:01.980> of 00:01:02.119 --> 00:01:02.129 align:start position:0% highly relevant because I think first of 00:01:02.129 --> 00:01:03.799 align:start position:0% highly relevant because I think first of all<00:01:02.219> it<00:01:02.370> highlights<00:01:02.820> that<00:01:03.030> we<00:01:03.210> sometimes 00:01:03.799 --> 00:01:03.809 align:start position:0% all it highlights that we sometimes 00:01:03.809 --> 00:01:06.590 align:start position:0% all it highlights that we sometimes forget<00:01:04.080> why<00:01:05.040> we<00:01:05.250> measure<00:01:05.460> lung<00:01:05.700> function<00:01:06.150> but 00:01:06.590 --> 00:01:06.600 align:start position:0% forget why we measure lung function but 00:01:06.600 --> 00:01:08.840 align:start position:0% forget why we measure lung function but also<00:01:06.630> it<00:01:07.110> got<00:01:07.260> away<00:01:07.470> from<00:01:07.740> this<00:01:07.890> what<00:01:08.430> is<00:01:08.580> the 00:01:08.840 --> 00:01:08.850 align:start position:0% also it got away from this what is the 00:01:08.850 --> 00:01:10.730 align:start position:0% also it got away from this what is the best<00:01:09.060> only<00:01:09.689> one<00:01:09.900> because<00:01:10.320> I<00:01:10.470> think<00:01:10.530> that's 00:01:10.730 --> 00:01:10.740 align:start position:0% best only one because I think that's 00:01:10.740 --> 00:01:12.710 align:start position:0% best only one because I think that's what<00:01:11.010> we're<00:01:11.159> going<00:01:11.340> to<00:01:11.460> discuss<00:01:11.850> that<00:01:11.880> if<00:01:12.479> it's 00:01:12.710 --> 00:01:12.720 align:start position:0% what we're going to discuss that if it's 00:01:12.720 --> 00:01:15.230 align:start position:0% what we're going to discuss that if it's a<00:01:12.840> heterogeneous<00:01:13.320> disease<00:01:13.710> why<00:01:14.610> do<00:01:14.670> we<00:01:15.000> think 00:01:15.230 --> 00:01:15.240 align:start position:0% a heterogeneous disease why do we think 00:01:15.240 --> 00:01:17.359 align:start position:0% a heterogeneous disease why do we think we<00:01:15.390> can<00:01:15.540> have<00:01:15.659> one<00:01:15.840> measure<00:01:16.080> I<00:01:16.380> think<00:01:16.950> we<00:01:17.220> got 00:01:17.359 --> 00:01:17.369 align:start position:0% we can have one measure I think we got 00:01:17.369 --> 00:01:19.370 align:start position:0% we can have one measure I think we got around<00:01:17.610> some<00:01:17.820> of<00:01:17.850> those<00:01:18.030> issues<00:01:18.090> yes<00:01:19.020> I<00:01:19.170> think 00:01:19.370 --> 00:01:19.380 align:start position:0% around some of those issues yes I think 00:01:19.380 --> 00:01:22.399 align:start position:0% around some of those issues yes I think it<00:01:19.560> was<00:01:19.740> a<00:01:20.009> general<00:01:20.610> agreement<00:01:21.150> one<00:01:21.780> solitary 00:01:22.399 --> 00:01:22.409 align:start position:0% it was a general agreement one solitary 00:01:22.409 --> 00:01:24.560 align:start position:0% it was a general agreement one solitary measurement<00:01:23.009> isn't<00:01:23.189> all<00:01:23.520> that<00:01:23.820> we<00:01:23.970> need<00:01:24.210> we 00:01:24.560 --> 00:01:24.570 align:start position:0% measurement isn't all that we need we 00:01:24.570 --> 00:01:27.620 align:start position:0% measurement isn't all that we need we need<00:01:24.600> more<00:01:25.590> data<00:01:26.400> to<00:01:26.580> get<00:01:26.909> a<00:01:26.970> more<00:01:27.450> complete 00:01:27.620 --> 00:01:27.630 align:start position:0% need more data to get a more complete 00:01:27.630 --> 00:01:30.999 align:start position:0% need more data to get a more complete picture<00:01:28.009> so<00:01:29.009> if<00:01:29.100> we<00:01:29.220> start<00:01:29.490> with<00:01:29.610> the<00:01:29.939> fev1<00:01:30.180> hmm 00:01:30.999 --> 00:01:31.009 align:start position:0% picture so if we start with the fev1 hmm 00:01:31.009 --> 00:01:35.810 align:start position:0% picture so if we start with the fev1 hmm it<00:01:32.009> seems<00:01:32.369> to<00:01:32.610> me<00:01:32.759> that<00:01:34.250> translating<00:01:35.250> the 00:01:35.810 --> 00:01:35.820 align:start position:0% it seems to me that translating the 00:01:35.820 --> 00:01:37.240 align:start position:0% it seems to me that translating the measurements<00:01:36.329> into<00:01:36.479> clinical<00:01:37.110> practice 00:01:37.240 --> 00:01:37.250 align:start position:0% measurements into clinical practice 00:01:37.250 --> 00:01:40.249 align:start position:0% measurements into clinical practice actually<00:01:38.250> rather<00:01:38.700> limited<00:01:39.030> it's<00:01:39.720> essential 00:01:40.249 --> 00:01:40.259 align:start position:0% actually rather limited it's essential 00:01:40.259 --> 00:01:42.590 align:start position:0% actually rather limited it's essential for<00:01:40.290> diagnosis<00:01:41.100> as<00:01:41.400> a<00:01:41.460> member<00:01:42.030> of<00:01:42.060> gold<00:01:42.360> you 00:01:42.590 --> 00:01:42.600 align:start position:0% for diagnosis as a member of gold you 00:01:42.600 --> 00:01:45.499 align:start position:0% for diagnosis as a member of gold you will<00:01:42.750> still<00:01:43.020> say<00:01:43.229> that<00:01:43.460> but<00:01:44.460> in<00:01:44.729> terms<00:01:45.210> of<00:01:45.329> its 00:01:45.499 --> 00:01:45.509 align:start position:0% will still say that but in terms of its 00:01:45.509 --> 00:01:48.310 align:start position:0% will still say that but in terms of its contribution<00:01:46.200> to<00:01:46.590> how<00:01:47.130> we<00:01:47.189> make<00:01:47.520> decisions 00:01:48.310 --> 00:01:48.320 align:start position:0% contribution to how we make decisions 00:01:48.320 --> 00:01:51.230 align:start position:0% contribution to how we make decisions what<00:01:49.320> do<00:01:49.439> you<00:01:49.530> think<00:01:49.710> about<00:01:49.829> that<00:01:50.189> now<00:01:51.030> I<00:01:51.060> think 00:01:51.230 --> 00:01:51.240 align:start position:0% what do you think about that now I think 00:01:51.240 --> 00:01:54.620 align:start position:0% what do you think about that now I think it<00:01:51.479> first<00:01:51.869> of<00:01:51.990> all<00:01:52.140> I'm<00:01:52.409> a<00:01:52.920> lot<00:01:53.790> in<00:01:54.000> favor<00:01:54.270> of 00:01:54.620 --> 00:01:54.630 align:start position:0% it first of all I'm a lot in favor of 00:01:54.630 --> 00:01:56.539 align:start position:0% it first of all I'm a lot in favor of measuring<00:01:55.020> if<00:01:55.140> everyone<00:01:55.560> and<00:01:55.799> it<00:01:56.310> mainly 00:01:56.539 --> 00:01:56.549 align:start position:0% measuring if everyone and it mainly 00:01:56.549 --> 00:01:58.880 align:start position:0% measuring if everyone and it mainly comes<00:01:56.850> because<00:01:57.090> apart<00:01:58.049> from<00:01:58.170> being<00:01:58.320> clinician 00:01:58.880 --> 00:01:58.890 align:start position:0% comes because apart from being clinician 00:01:58.890 --> 00:02:00.230 align:start position:0% comes because apart from being clinician I<00:01:58.950> see<00:01:59.159> patients<00:01:59.640> I'm<00:01:59.820> also<00:02:00.030> an 00:02:00.230 --> 00:02:00.240 align:start position:0% I see patients I'm also an 00:02:00.240 --> 00:02:02.660 align:start position:0% I see patients I'm also an epidemiologist<00:02:00.960> and<00:02:01.229> fev1<00:02:01.860> you<00:02:02.310> can<00:02:02.490> measure 00:02:02.660 --> 00:02:02.670 align:start position:0% epidemiologist and fev1 you can measure 00:02:02.670 --> 00:02:05.330 align:start position:0% epidemiologist and fev1 you can measure in<00:02:02.909> huge<00:02:03.210> populations<00:02:03.990> and<00:02:04.229> that's<00:02:04.860> why<00:02:05.100> we 00:02:05.330 --> 00:02:05.340 align:start position:0% in huge populations and that's why we 00:02:05.340 --> 00:02:06.950 align:start position:0% in huge populations and that's why we know<00:02:05.490> a<00:02:05.520> lot<00:02:05.759> about<00:02:05.820> the<00:02:06.210> natural<00:02:06.360> history<00:02:06.689> of 00:02:06.950 --> 00:02:06.960 align:start position:0% know a lot about the natural history of 00:02:06.960 --> 00:02:09.169 align:start position:0% know a lot about the natural history of the<00:02:07.110> disease<00:02:07.140> about<00:02:07.710> progression<00:02:08.280> of<00:02:08.580> fev1 00:02:09.169 --> 00:02:09.179 align:start position:0% the disease about progression of fev1 00:02:09.179 --> 00:02:12.199 align:start position:0% the disease about progression of fev1 and<00:02:09.390> we<00:02:10.229> know<00:02:10.410> it<00:02:10.739> is<00:02:10.890> a<00:02:11.099> proper<00:02:11.580> tool<00:02:11.790> for 00:02:12.199 --> 00:02:12.209 align:start position:0% and we know it is a proper tool for 00:02:12.209 --> 00:02:13.400 align:start position:0% and we know it is a proper tool for making<00:02:12.360> the<00:02:12.629> diagnosis<00:02:13.230> of<00:02:13.290> the 00:02:13.400 --> 00:02:13.410 align:start position:0% making the diagnosis of the 00:02:13.410 --> 00:02:15.830 align:start position:0% making the diagnosis of the Rachele<00:02:13.890> however<00:02:14.340> we<00:02:14.580> measure<00:02:14.790> it<00:02:15.030> express<00:02:15.660> it 00:02:15.830 --> 00:02:15.840 align:start position:0% Rachele however we measure it express it 00:02:15.840 --> 00:02:18.320 align:start position:0% Rachele however we measure it express it is<00:02:16.200> a<00:02:16.260> good<00:02:16.680> measure<00:02:17.040> airflow<00:02:17.580> limitation<00:02:17.610> and 00:02:18.320 --> 00:02:18.330 align:start position:0% is a good measure airflow limitation and 00:02:18.330 --> 00:02:20.840 align:start position:0% is a good measure airflow limitation and that's<00:02:19.140> where<00:02:19.380> all<00:02:19.560> the<00:02:19.710> goods<00:02:19.890> things<00:02:20.190> stop 00:02:20.840 --> 00:02:20.850 align:start position:0% that's where all the goods things stop 00:02:20.850 --> 00:02:23.840 align:start position:0% that's where all the goods things stop because<00:02:21.720> first<00:02:21.990> of<00:02:22.170> all<00:02:22.290> we<00:02:22.590> can<00:02:23.130> debate<00:02:23.310> which 00:02:23.840 --> 00:02:23.850 align:start position:0% because first of all we can debate which 00:02:23.850 --> 00:02:26.900 align:start position:0% because first of all we can debate which cut<00:02:24.180> offs<00:02:24.390> of<00:02:24.600> fev1<00:02:25.020> would<00:02:25.890> signify<00:02:26.340> mild 00:02:26.900 --> 00:02:26.910 align:start position:0% cut offs of fev1 would signify mild 00:02:26.910 --> 00:02:29.570 align:start position:0% cut offs of fev1 would signify mild moderate<00:02:27.390> or<00:02:27.570> severe<00:02:27.840> disease<00:02:28.230> we<00:02:28.980> know<00:02:29.250> that 00:02:29.570 --> 00:02:29.580 align:start position:0% moderate or severe disease we know that 00:02:29.580 --> 00:02:31.850 align:start position:0% moderate or severe disease we know that it's<00:02:30.060> not<00:02:30.270> predictive<00:02:30.960> of<00:02:31.080> treatment<00:02:31.560> effects 00:02:31.850 --> 00:02:31.860 align:start position:0% it's not predictive of treatment effects 00:02:31.860 --> 00:02:34.640 align:start position:0% it's not predictive of treatment effects we've<00:02:32.100> actually<00:02:32.580> taken<00:02:32.940> fev1<00:02:33.480> out<00:02:34.200> of<00:02:34.560> the 00:02:34.640 --> 00:02:34.650 align:start position:0% we've actually taken fev1 out of the 00:02:34.650 --> 00:02:36.350 align:start position:0% we've actually taken fev1 out of the treatment<00:02:35.070> recommendations<00:02:35.760> within<00:02:35.970> gold 00:02:36.350 --> 00:02:36.360 align:start position:0% treatment recommendations within gold 00:02:36.360 --> 00:02:39.920 align:start position:0% treatment recommendations within gold and<00:02:36.660> for<00:02:37.560> the<00:02:37.650> patient<00:02:38.160> themselves<00:02:38.720> they<00:02:39.720> I 00:02:39.920 --> 00:02:39.930 align:start position:0% and for the patient themselves they I 00:02:39.930 --> 00:02:42.440 align:start position:0% and for the patient themselves they I often<00:02:40.440> talk<00:02:41.220> to<00:02:41.430> patients<00:02:41.640> who<00:02:42.000> feel<00:02:42.240> that 00:02:42.440 --> 00:02:42.450 align:start position:0% often talk to patients who feel that 00:02:42.450 --> 00:02:44.570 align:start position:0% often talk to patients who feel that their<00:02:42.660> fev1<00:02:42.960> is<00:02:43.380> not<00:02:43.530> explaining<00:02:44.190> that<00:02:44.310> today 00:02:44.570 --> 00:02:44.580 align:start position:0% their fev1 is not explaining that today 00:02:44.580 --> 00:02:45.380 align:start position:0% their fev1 is not explaining that today I'm<00:02:44.700> much<00:02:44.880> worse 00:02:45.380 --> 00:02:45.390 align:start position:0% I'm much worse 00:02:45.390 --> 00:02:47.030 align:start position:0% I'm much worse or<00:02:45.450> it's<00:02:46.260> strange<00:02:46.590> it<00:02:46.710> hasn't<00:02:47.010> changed 00:02:47.030 --> 00:02:47.040 align:start position:0% or it's strange it hasn't changed 00:02:47.040 --> 00:02:48.650 align:start position:0% or it's strange it hasn't changed because<00:02:47.430> I<00:02:47.550> feel<00:02:47.760> much<00:02:47.910> better<00:02:47.970> than<00:02:48.450> six 00:02:48.650 --> 00:02:48.660 align:start position:0% because I feel much better than six 00:02:48.660 --> 00:02:51.050 align:start position:0% because I feel much better than six months<00:02:48.840> ago<00:02:49.080> so<00:02:49.740> it<00:02:49.860> has<00:02:50.010> clear<00:02:50.400> limitations 00:02:51.050 --> 00:02:51.060 align:start position:0% months ago so it has clear limitations 00:02:51.060 --> 00:02:55.160 align:start position:0% months ago so it has clear limitations yes<00:02:52.050> as<00:02:52.290> a<00:02:52.590> proxy<00:02:53.160> measure<00:02:53.460> of<00:02:54.170> what's 00:02:55.160 --> 00:02:55.170 align:start position:0% yes as a proxy measure of what's 00:02:55.170 --> 00:02:57.320 align:start position:0% yes as a proxy measure of what's important<00:02:55.770> to<00:02:55.860> the<00:02:55.950> patient<00:02:56.430> health<00:02:56.850> status 00:02:57.320 --> 00:02:57.330 align:start position:0% important to the patient health status 00:02:57.330 --> 00:02:59.750 align:start position:0% important to the patient health status symptoms<00:02:57.750> or<00:02:58.020> exercise<00:02:58.530> capacity<00:02:58.770> is<00:02:59.370> very 00:02:59.750 --> 00:02:59.760 align:start position:0% symptoms or exercise capacity is very 00:02:59.760 --> 00:03:02.720 align:start position:0% symptoms or exercise capacity is very weak<00:02:59.970> yeah<00:03:00.420> it<00:03:00.900> predicts<00:03:01.560> all<00:03:01.680> core<00:03:01.920> mortality 00:03:02.720 --> 00:03:02.730 align:start position:0% weak yeah it predicts all core mortality 00:03:02.730 --> 00:03:04.940 align:start position:0% weak yeah it predicts all core mortality but<00:03:02.910> at<00:03:03.060> a<00:03:03.180> very<00:03:03.210> low<00:03:03.660> level<00:03:03.690> and<00:03:04.230> you<00:03:04.590> taking 00:03:04.940 --> 00:03:04.950 align:start position:0% but at a very low level and you taking 00:03:04.950 --> 00:03:06.560 align:start position:0% but at a very low level and you taking it<00:03:05.100> out<00:03:05.250> of<00:03:05.310> gold<00:03:05.640> as<00:03:05.970> a<00:03:06.000> predictor<00:03:06.510> of 00:03:06.560 --> 00:03:06.570 align:start position:0% it out of gold as a predictor of 00:03:06.570 --> 00:03:08.720 align:start position:0% it out of gold as a predictor of exacerbations<00:03:07.410> it<00:03:07.980> does<00:03:08.190> tell<00:03:08.430> us<00:03:08.520> about 00:03:08.720 --> 00:03:08.730 align:start position:0% exacerbations it does tell us about 00:03:08.730 --> 00:03:11.540 align:start position:0% exacerbations it does tell us about bronchodilators<00:03:09.690> it<00:03:10.230> does<00:03:10.470> and<00:03:10.740> it<00:03:11.100> gives<00:03:11.340> us 00:03:11.540 --> 00:03:11.550 align:start position:0% bronchodilators it does and it gives us 00:03:11.550 --> 00:03:15.110 align:start position:0% bronchodilators it does and it gives us a<00:03:11.730> crude<00:03:12.450> measure<00:03:12.990> of<00:03:13.350> air<00:03:14.250> flow<00:03:14.640> sort<00:03:15.030> of 00:03:15.110 --> 00:03:15.120 align:start position:0% a crude measure of air flow sort of 00:03:15.120 --> 00:03:18.199 align:start position:0% a crude measure of air flow sort of diameter<00:03:15.900> which<00:03:16.440> is<00:03:16.650> not<00:03:16.920> perfect<00:03:17.190> but<00:03:18.090> it 00:03:18.199 --> 00:03:18.209 align:start position:0% diameter which is not perfect but it 00:03:18.209 --> 00:03:20.210 align:start position:0% diameter which is not perfect but it does<00:03:18.240> contain<00:03:18.810> predictive<00:03:19.470> value<00:03:19.800> and<00:03:20.010> I 00:03:20.210 --> 00:03:20.220 align:start position:0% does contain predictive value and I 00:03:20.220 --> 00:03:21.620 align:start position:0% does contain predictive value and I think<00:03:20.430> for<00:03:20.610> me<00:03:20.760> it<00:03:20.940> gives<00:03:21.090> me<00:03:21.270> a<00:03:21.360> starting 00:03:21.620 --> 00:03:21.630 align:start position:0% think for me it gives me a starting 00:03:21.630 --> 00:03:24.170 align:start position:0% think for me it gives me a starting point<00:03:22.050> nothing<00:03:22.890> more<00:03:23.070> but<00:03:23.520> it's<00:03:23.700> nice<00:03:23.850> to<00:03:23.880> be 00:03:24.170 --> 00:03:24.180 align:start position:0% point nothing more but it's nice to be 00:03:24.180 --> 00:03:25.880 align:start position:0% point nothing more but it's nice to be anchored<00:03:24.420> in<00:03:24.750> something<00:03:25.200> and<00:03:25.320> then<00:03:25.440> going<00:03:25.770> on 00:03:25.880 --> 00:03:25.890 align:start position:0% anchored in something and then going on 00:03:25.890 --> 00:03:27.530 align:start position:0% anchored in something and then going on from<00:03:26.130> there<00:03:26.340> and<00:03:27.000> I<00:03:27.150> think<00:03:27.240> for<00:03:27.390> instance 00:03:27.530 --> 00:03:27.540 align:start position:0% from there and I think for instance 00:03:27.540 --> 00:03:29.930 align:start position:0% from there and I think for instance expecting<00:03:28.380> it<00:03:28.500> to<00:03:28.830> equate<00:03:29.280> to<00:03:29.310> breathlessness 00:03:29.930 --> 00:03:29.940 align:start position:0% expecting it to equate to breathlessness 00:03:29.940 --> 00:03:31.730 align:start position:0% expecting it to equate to breathlessness I<00:03:30.300> mean<00:03:30.900> if<00:03:31.110> I<00:03:31.230> want<00:03:31.410> to<00:03:31.500> know<00:03:31.620> about 00:03:31.730 --> 00:03:31.740 align:start position:0% I mean if I want to know about 00:03:31.740 --> 00:03:33.110 align:start position:0% I mean if I want to know about breathlessness<00:03:32.250> why<00:03:32.550> would<00:03:32.820> I<00:03:32.850> do<00:03:33.000> a 00:03:33.110 --> 00:03:33.120 align:start position:0% breathlessness why would I do a 00:03:33.120 --> 00:03:35.390 align:start position:0% breathlessness why would I do a physiology<00:03:33.750> measure<00:03:33.959> I<00:03:34.230> can<00:03:34.590> ask<00:03:34.740> the<00:03:34.980> patient 00:03:35.390 --> 00:03:35.400 align:start position:0% physiology measure I can ask the patient 00:03:35.400 --> 00:03:37.340 align:start position:0% physiology measure I can ask the patient and<00:03:35.550> did<00:03:35.700> it<00:03:35.790> so<00:03:35.880> it's<00:03:36.360> about<00:03:36.600> what<00:03:36.810> we<00:03:36.900> expect 00:03:37.340 --> 00:03:37.350 align:start position:0% and did it so it's about what we expect 00:03:37.350 --> 00:03:38.630 align:start position:0% and did it so it's about what we expect from<00:03:37.500> a<00:03:37.650> measure<00:03:37.830> I<00:03:38.100> think<00:03:38.310> that's<00:03:38.490> the 00:03:38.630 --> 00:03:38.640 align:start position:0% from a measure I think that's the 00:03:38.640 --> 00:03:41.720 align:start position:0% from a measure I think that's the crucial<00:03:38.790> thing<00:03:39.240> yes<00:03:40.110> and<00:03:40.380> I<00:03:41.070> think<00:03:41.400> the 00:03:41.720 --> 00:03:41.730 align:start position:0% crucial thing yes and I think the 00:03:41.730 --> 00:03:43.729 align:start position:0% crucial thing yes and I think the probably<00:03:42.180> gone<00:03:42.360> as<00:03:42.540> far<00:03:42.840> as<00:03:42.900> we<00:03:43.230> can<00:03:43.500> do<00:03:43.680> in 00:03:43.729 --> 00:03:43.739 align:start position:0% probably gone as far as we can do in 00:03:43.739 --> 00:03:46.190 align:start position:0% probably gone as far as we can do in terms<00:03:44.010> of<00:03:44.190> the<00:03:44.310> everyone<00:03:44.850> in<00:03:45.060> new<00:03:45.570> treatments 00:03:46.190 --> 00:03:46.200 align:start position:0% terms of the everyone in new treatments 00:03:46.200 --> 00:03:47.420 align:start position:0% terms of the everyone in new treatments -<00:03:46.530> oh<00:03:46.770> absolutely 00:03:47.420 --> 00:03:47.430 align:start position:0% - oh absolutely 00:03:47.430 --> 00:03:49.520 align:start position:0% - oh absolutely which<00:03:47.760> brings<00:03:48.150> us<00:03:48.360> to<00:03:48.510> the<00:03:48.780> other<00:03:48.810> newer 00:03:49.520 --> 00:03:49.530 align:start position:0% which brings us to the other newer 00:03:49.530 --> 00:03:52.670 align:start position:0% which brings us to the other newer methods<00:03:50.070> yes<00:03:50.400> it<00:03:50.790> seems<00:03:51.600> to<00:03:51.720> me<00:03:51.930> a<00:03:51.959> primarily 00:03:52.670 --> 00:03:52.680 align:start position:0% methods yes it seems to me a primarily 00:03:52.680 --> 00:03:55.040 align:start position:0% methods yes it seems to me a primarily focused<00:03:53.340> on<00:03:53.489> the<00:03:53.670> small<00:03:53.970> Airways<00:03:54.390> which<00:03:54.870> is 00:03:55.040 --> 00:03:55.050 align:start position:0% focused on the small Airways which is 00:03:55.050 --> 00:03:57.970 align:start position:0% focused on the small Airways which is probably<00:03:55.410> where<00:03:55.650> the<00:03:55.770> disease<00:03:56.270> starts<00:03:57.270> and 00:03:57.970 --> 00:03:57.980 align:start position:0% probably where the disease starts and 00:03:57.980 --> 00:04:00.410 align:start position:0% probably where the disease starts and it's<00:03:58.980> in<00:03:59.250> although<00:03:59.550> there<00:04:00.209> were<00:04:00.270> some 00:04:00.410 --> 00:04:00.420 align:start position:0% it's in although there were some 00:04:00.420 --> 00:04:02.979 align:start position:0% it's in although there were some examples<00:04:01.290> of<00:04:01.410> their<00:04:01.590> clinical<00:04:02.190> application 00:04:02.979 --> 00:04:02.989 align:start position:0% examples of their clinical application 00:04:02.989 --> 00:04:06.440 align:start position:0% examples of their clinical application it<00:04:03.989> seems<00:04:04.470> that<00:04:05.130> these<00:04:05.370> are<00:04:05.670> more<00:04:05.880> research 00:04:06.440 --> 00:04:06.450 align:start position:0% it seems that these are more research 00:04:06.450 --> 00:04:08.620 align:start position:0% it seems that these are more research tools<00:04:06.870> that<00:04:07.140> could<00:04:07.290> be<00:04:07.350> used<00:04:07.440> to<00:04:07.770> identify 00:04:08.620 --> 00:04:08.630 align:start position:0% tools that could be used to identify 00:04:08.630 --> 00:04:11.479 align:start position:0% tools that could be used to identify therapeutic<00:04:09.630> targets<00:04:10.250> earlier<00:04:11.250> in<00:04:11.370> the 00:04:11.479 --> 00:04:11.489 align:start position:0% therapeutic targets earlier in the 00:04:11.489 --> 00:04:13.880 align:start position:0% therapeutic targets earlier in the disease<00:04:11.790> and<00:04:12.090> end-stage<00:04:12.600> COPD<00:04:12.959> that<00:04:13.560> we<00:04:13.650> have 00:04:13.880 --> 00:04:13.890 align:start position:0% disease and end-stage COPD that we have 00:04:13.890 --> 00:04:15.740 align:start position:0% disease and end-stage COPD that we have yes<00:04:14.370> I<00:04:14.550> would<00:04:14.760> imagine<00:04:14.970> that<00:04:15.209> if<00:04:15.420> you<00:04:15.540> had<00:04:15.720> a 00:04:15.740 --> 00:04:15.750 align:start position:0% yes I would imagine that if you had a 00:04:15.750 --> 00:04:17.870 align:start position:0% yes I would imagine that if you had a new<00:04:15.989> biologic<00:04:16.709> that<00:04:16.919> would<00:04:17.160> reduce 00:04:17.870 --> 00:04:17.880 align:start position:0% new biologic that would reduce 00:04:17.880 --> 00:04:20.300 align:start position:0% new biologic that would reduce inflammation<00:04:18.720> in<00:04:18.810> small<00:04:19.080> Airways<00:04:19.500> and<00:04:19.770> you 00:04:20.300 --> 00:04:20.310 align:start position:0% inflammation in small Airways and you 00:04:20.310 --> 00:04:22.039 align:start position:0% inflammation in small Airways and you wanted<00:04:20.609> a<00:04:20.700> quick<00:04:20.940> signal<00:04:21.359> for<00:04:21.570> a<00:04:21.600> phase<00:04:21.810> 2 00:04:22.039 --> 00:04:22.049 align:start position:0% wanted a quick signal for a phase 2 00:04:22.049 --> 00:04:24.380 align:start position:0% wanted a quick signal for a phase 2 study<00:04:22.350> you<00:04:22.860> will<00:04:23.039> not<00:04:23.310> get<00:04:23.550> that<00:04:23.729> signal<00:04:24.210> with 00:04:24.380 --> 00:04:24.390 align:start position:0% study you will not get that signal with 00:04:24.390 --> 00:04:24.760 align:start position:0% study you will not get that signal with Fe 00:04:24.760 --> 00:04:24.770 align:start position:0% Fe 00:04:24.770 --> 00:04:27.279 align:start position:0% Fe one<00:04:25.009> over<00:04:25.759> the<00:04:25.819> symptoms<00:04:26.300> all<00:04:26.599> the<00:04:26.780> six<00:04:26.990> minute 00:04:27.279 --> 00:04:27.289 align:start position:0% one over the symptoms all the six minute 00:04:27.289 --> 00:04:29.290 align:start position:0% one over the symptoms all the six minute walk<00:04:27.319> distance<00:04:27.889> not<00:04:28.129> even<00:04:28.400> health<00:04:28.639> status<00:04:29.090> I 00:04:29.290 --> 00:04:29.300 align:start position:0% walk distance not even health status I 00:04:29.300 --> 00:04:31.390 align:start position:0% walk distance not even health status I think<00:04:29.900> you<00:04:30.020> need<00:04:30.139> a<00:04:30.199> measurement<00:04:30.800> of<00:04:31.009> where 00:04:31.390 --> 00:04:31.400 align:start position:0% think you need a measurement of where 00:04:31.400 --> 00:04:33.100 align:start position:0% think you need a measurement of where things<00:04:31.610> are<00:04:31.819> going<00:04:32.000> on<00:04:32.240> and<00:04:32.449> that's<00:04:32.840> where<00:04:33.080> I 00:04:33.100 --> 00:04:33.110 align:start position:0% things are going on and that's where I 00:04:33.110 --> 00:04:35.499 align:start position:0% things are going on and that's where I will<00:04:33.349> see<00:04:33.470> multi<00:04:33.889> breath<00:04:34.069> washout<00:04:34.490> or<00:04:35.000> the<00:04:35.389> old 00:04:35.499 --> 00:04:35.509 align:start position:0% will see multi breath washout or the old 00:04:35.509 --> 00:04:37.360 align:start position:0% will see multi breath washout or the old single<00:04:35.870> breath<00:04:36.050> for<00:04:36.229> that<00:04:36.319> matter<00:04:36.560> or<00:04:36.889> perhaps 00:04:37.360 --> 00:04:37.370 align:start position:0% single breath for that matter or perhaps 00:04:37.370 --> 00:04:39.730 align:start position:0% single breath for that matter or perhaps a<00:04:37.669> salami<00:04:38.000> tree<00:04:38.270> in<00:04:38.479> providing<00:04:39.110> a<00:04:39.319> tool<00:04:39.560> that 00:04:39.730 --> 00:04:39.740 align:start position:0% a salami tree in providing a tool that 00:04:39.740 --> 00:04:42.369 align:start position:0% a salami tree in providing a tool that could<00:04:39.949> help<00:04:40.009> so<00:04:40.669> clearly<00:04:41.180> for<00:04:41.539> sort<00:04:41.750> of<00:04:41.840> more 00:04:42.369 --> 00:04:42.379 align:start position:0% could help so clearly for sort of more 00:04:42.379 --> 00:04:44.680 align:start position:0% could help so clearly for sort of more advanced<00:04:42.949> physiology<00:04:43.580> I<00:04:43.789> think<00:04:44.300> they<00:04:44.509> have<00:04:44.659> a 00:04:44.680 --> 00:04:44.690 align:start position:0% advanced physiology I think they have a 00:04:44.690 --> 00:04:46.990 align:start position:0% advanced physiology I think they have a role<00:04:44.930> but<00:04:45.830> the<00:04:45.949> discussion<00:04:46.370> was<00:04:46.520> more<00:04:46.729> how<00:04:46.940> do 00:04:46.990 --> 00:04:47.000 align:start position:0% role but the discussion was more how do 00:04:47.000 --> 00:04:49.089 align:start position:0% role but the discussion was more how do we<00:04:47.240> apply<00:04:47.449> it<00:04:47.599> in<00:04:47.810> populations<00:04:48.470> and<00:04:48.650> patients 00:04:49.089 --> 00:04:49.099 align:start position:0% we apply it in populations and patients 00:04:49.099 --> 00:04:52.600 align:start position:0% we apply it in populations and patients yes<00:04:49.610> I<00:04:49.940> will<00:04:50.569> I<00:04:50.720> was<00:04:50.900> impressed<00:04:51.289> by<00:04:51.500> the<00:04:51.949> the 00:04:52.600 --> 00:04:52.610 align:start position:0% yes I will I was impressed by the the 00:04:52.610 --> 00:04:55.420 align:start position:0% yes I will I was impressed by the the multi<00:04:53.150> breath<00:04:53.360> washout<00:04:53.810> data<00:04:54.110> in<00:04:54.740> patients 00:04:55.420 --> 00:04:55.430 align:start position:0% multi breath washout data in patients 00:04:55.430 --> 00:04:58.870 align:start position:0% multi breath washout data in patients with<00:04:56.169> bronchiolitis<00:04:57.169> obliterans<00:04:57.669> no<00:04:58.669> matter 00:04:58.870 --> 00:04:58.880 align:start position:0% with bronchiolitis obliterans no matter 00:04:58.880 --> 00:05:01.059 align:start position:0% with bronchiolitis obliterans no matter what<00:04:59.120> the<00:04:59.270> cause<00:04:59.539> was<00:04:59.569> but<00:05:00.440> that's<00:05:00.560> a<00:05:00.740> very 00:05:01.059 --> 00:05:01.069 align:start position:0% what the cause was but that's a very 00:05:01.069 --> 00:05:03.399 align:start position:0% what the cause was but that's a very specialized<00:05:01.880> groups<00:05:02.389> of<00:05:02.720> group<00:05:03.080> of<00:05:03.229> patients 00:05:03.399 --> 00:05:03.409 align:start position:0% specialized groups of group of patients 00:05:03.409 --> 00:05:05.770 align:start position:0% specialized groups of group of patients but<00:05:03.979> again<00:05:04.280> this<00:05:04.490> is<00:05:04.699> detecting<00:05:05.569> early 00:05:05.770 --> 00:05:05.780 align:start position:0% but again this is detecting early 00:05:05.780 --> 00:05:10.029 align:start position:0% but again this is detecting early disease<00:05:07.389> where<00:05:08.389> the<00:05:08.419> FE<00:05:08.810> one<00:05:09.050> is<00:05:09.229> not<00:05:09.710> going<00:05:09.919> to 00:05:10.029 --> 00:05:10.039 align:start position:0% disease where the FE one is not going to 00:05:10.039 --> 00:05:11.950 align:start position:0% disease where the FE one is not going to help<00:05:10.220> at<00:05:10.430> all<00:05:10.580> now<00:05:11.300> and<00:05:11.479> I<00:05:11.539> think<00:05:11.720> that's<00:05:11.870> a 00:05:11.950 --> 00:05:11.960 align:start position:0% help at all now and I think that's a 00:05:11.960 --> 00:05:13.659 align:start position:0% help at all now and I think that's a very<00:05:12.139> specific<00:05:12.380> example<00:05:12.740> where<00:05:13.190> we<00:05:13.460> know<00:05:13.639> that 00:05:13.659 --> 00:05:13.669 align:start position:0% very specific example where we know that 00:05:13.669 --> 00:05:15.460 align:start position:0% very specific example where we know that if<00:05:13.880> things<00:05:14.300> start<00:05:14.630> happening<00:05:14.810> in<00:05:15.199> small 00:05:15.460 --> 00:05:15.470 align:start position:0% if things start happening in small 00:05:15.470 --> 00:05:17.529 align:start position:0% if things start happening in small Airways<00:05:15.889> they<00:05:16.490> will<00:05:16.669> lead<00:05:16.819> to<00:05:17.030> something<00:05:17.240> bad 00:05:17.529 --> 00:05:17.539 align:start position:0% Airways they will lead to something bad 00:05:17.539 --> 00:05:19.300 align:start position:0% Airways they will lead to something bad so<00:05:17.900> if<00:05:17.960> you're<00:05:18.080> a<00:05:18.110> post<00:05:18.380> transplant<00:05:18.740> patient 00:05:19.300 --> 00:05:19.310 align:start position:0% so if you're a post transplant patient 00:05:19.310 --> 00:05:21.129 align:start position:0% so if you're a post transplant patient you<00:05:19.729> don't<00:05:19.940> want<00:05:20.150> things<00:05:20.389> to<00:05:20.569> get<00:05:20.690> worse<00:05:20.900> in 00:05:21.129 --> 00:05:21.139 align:start position:0% you don't want things to get worse in 00:05:21.139 --> 00:05:23.709 align:start position:0% you don't want things to get worse in your<00:05:21.169> small<00:05:21.500> Airways<00:05:21.889> of<00:05:22.069> course<00:05:22.849> if<00:05:23.060> you<00:05:23.509> are 00:05:23.709 --> 00:05:23.719 align:start position:0% your small Airways of course if you are 00:05:23.719 --> 00:05:25.990 align:start position:0% your small Airways of course if you are a<00:05:23.750> smoker<00:05:24.080> or<00:05:24.379> exposed<00:05:24.889> to<00:05:25.069> things<00:05:25.250> that<00:05:25.490> might 00:05:25.990 --> 00:05:26.000 align:start position:0% a smoker or exposed to things that might 00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:27.700 align:start position:0% a smoker or exposed to things that might give<00:05:26.270> you<00:05:26.389> C<00:05:26.599> or<00:05:26.719> D<00:05:26.810> you<00:05:26.930> don't<00:05:27.229> want<00:05:27.469> things 00:05:27.700 --> 00:05:27.710 align:start position:0% give you C or D you don't want things 00:05:27.710 --> 00:05:29.379 align:start position:0% give you C or D you don't want things happening<00:05:28.159> in<00:05:28.250> the<00:05:28.340> small<00:05:28.610> Airways<00:05:28.909> either 00:05:29.379 --> 00:05:29.389 align:start position:0% happening in the small Airways either 00:05:29.389 --> 00:05:31.570 align:start position:0% happening in the small Airways either but<00:05:30.259> I<00:05:30.289> think<00:05:30.500> there's<00:05:30.650> a<00:05:30.710> history<00:05:31.099> from<00:05:31.340> when 00:05:31.570 --> 00:05:31.580 align:start position:0% but I think there's a history from when 00:05:31.580 --> 00:05:33.969 align:start position:0% but I think there's a history from when we<00:05:31.819> try<00:05:32.270> to<00:05:32.330> apply<00:05:32.750> single<00:05:33.259> breath<00:05:33.440> nitrogen 00:05:33.969 --> 00:05:33.979 align:start position:0% we try to apply single breath nitrogen 00:05:33.979 --> 00:05:36.370 align:start position:0% we try to apply single breath nitrogen tests<00:05:34.250> to<00:05:34.789> populations<00:05:35.479> and<00:05:35.690> showed<00:05:35.900> that<00:05:35.930> a 00:05:36.370 --> 00:05:36.380 align:start position:0% tests to populations and showed that a 00:05:36.380 --> 00:05:39.129 align:start position:0% tests to populations and showed that a lot<00:05:36.800> of<00:05:36.830> patients<00:05:37.069> had<00:05:37.490> abnormal<00:05:37.789> values<00:05:38.360> but 00:05:39.129 --> 00:05:39.139 align:start position:0% lot of patients had abnormal values but 00:05:39.139 --> 00:05:41.409 align:start position:0% lot of patients had abnormal values but didn't<00:05:39.409> go<00:05:39.530> on<00:05:39.710> to<00:05:39.830> develop<00:05:40.039> c<00:05:40.400> over<00:05:40.639> d<00:05:40.669> so<00:05:41.210> it's 00:05:41.409 --> 00:05:41.419 align:start position:0% didn't go on to develop c over d so it's 00:05:41.419 --> 00:05:43.570 align:start position:0% didn't go on to develop c over d so it's not<00:05:41.539> a<00:05:41.599> really<00:05:42.110> good<00:05:42.349> mark<00:05:42.800> of<00:05:43.009> early<00:05:43.310> disease 00:05:43.570 --> 00:05:43.580 align:start position:0% not a really good mark of early disease 00:05:43.580 --> 00:05:45.730 align:start position:0% not a really good mark of early disease it's<00:05:43.849> a<00:05:43.940> mark<00:05:44.150> of<00:05:44.240> something<00:05:44.599> going<00:05:44.840> on<00:05:44.960> but<00:05:45.620> it 00:05:45.730 --> 00:05:45.740 align:start position:0% it's a mark of something going on but it 00:05:45.740 --> 00:05:48.100 align:start position:0% it's a mark of something going on but it may<00:05:45.949> not<00:05:46.190> lead<00:05:46.370> to<00:05:46.400> disease<00:05:46.880> and<00:05:47.150> that's<00:05:47.270> where 00:05:48.100 --> 00:05:48.110 align:start position:0% may not lead to disease and that's where 00:05:48.110 --> 00:05:52.209 align:start position:0% may not lead to disease and that's where we<00:05:48.979> want<00:05:49.219> to<00:05:49.310> be<00:05:49.639> I<00:05:50.020> was<00:05:51.020> put<00:05:51.349> in<00:05:51.469> my<00:05:51.620> place<00:05:51.860> by 00:05:52.209 --> 00:05:52.219 align:start position:0% we want to be I was put in my place by 00:05:52.219 --> 00:05:55.180 align:start position:0% we want to be I was put in my place by by<00:05:52.400> my<00:05:53.000> question<00:05:53.449> about<00:05:53.690> effort<00:05:54.169> II<00:05:54.349> when<00:05:54.620> when 00:05:55.180 --> 00:05:55.190 align:start position:0% by my question about effort II when when 00:05:55.190 --> 00:05:58.209 align:start position:0% by my question about effort II when when Peter<00:05:55.460> Kelly<00:05:56.000> says<00:05:56.240> it<00:05:56.690> helps<00:05:57.169> in<00:05:57.319> my<00:05:57.800> disease 00:05:58.209 --> 00:05:58.219 align:start position:0% Peter Kelly says it helps in my disease 00:05:58.219 --> 00:06:00.279 align:start position:0% Peter Kelly says it helps in my disease management<00:05:58.639> and<00:05:59.060> he<00:05:59.330> actually<00:05:59.479> didn't<00:06:00.050> give 00:06:00.279 --> 00:06:00.289 align:start position:0% management and he actually didn't give 00:06:00.289 --> 00:06:01.870 align:start position:0% management and he actually didn't give me<00:06:00.440> a<00:06:00.469> direct<00:06:00.860> answer<00:06:01.009> when<00:06:01.310> I<00:06:01.430> asked<00:06:01.759> him<00:06:01.819> for 00:06:01.870 --> 00:06:01.880 align:start position:0% me a direct answer when I asked him for 00:06:01.880 --> 00:06:05.170 align:start position:0% me a direct answer when I asked him for a<00:06:02.060> specific<00:06:02.300> example<00:06:03.020> but<00:06:03.949> I<00:06:04.190> was<00:06:04.789> impressed 00:06:05.170 --> 00:06:05.180 align:start position:0% a specific example but I was impressed 00:06:05.180 --> 00:06:07.420 align:start position:0% a specific example but I was impressed by<00:06:05.360> the<00:06:05.509> answer<00:06:06.050> in<00:06:06.229> all<00:06:06.500> the<00:06:06.800> people<00:06:07.190> who<00:06:07.310> are 00:06:07.420 --> 00:06:07.430 align:start position:0% by the answer in all the people who are 00:06:07.430 --> 00:06:09.640 align:start position:0% by the answer in all the people who are cognitively<00:06:08.029> impaired<00:06:08.509> who<00:06:08.960> can't<00:06:09.349> let<00:06:09.620> a 00:06:09.640 --> 00:06:09.650 align:start position:0% cognitively impaired who can't let a 00:06:09.650 --> 00:06:12.779 align:start position:0% cognitively impaired who can't let a force<00:06:09.949> expertly<00:06:10.729> maneuver<00:06:11.330> it<00:06:11.690> help<00:06:12.050> exclude 00:06:12.779 --> 00:06:12.789 align:start position:0% force expertly maneuver it help exclude 00:06:12.789 --> 00:06:15.399 align:start position:0% force expertly maneuver it help exclude significant<00:06:13.789> Airways<00:06:14.539> disease<00:06:14.569> and<00:06:15.349> I 00:06:15.399 --> 00:06:15.409 align:start position:0% significant Airways disease and I 00:06:15.409 --> 00:06:17.620 align:start position:0% significant Airways disease and I thought<00:06:15.620> that<00:06:15.830> was<00:06:15.979> a<00:06:16.009> nice<00:06:16.580> application<00:06:16.880> I 00:06:17.620 --> 00:06:17.630 align:start position:0% thought that was a nice application I 00:06:17.630 --> 00:06:19.029 align:start position:0% thought that was a nice application I think<00:06:17.779> it<00:06:18.110> is<00:06:18.229> because<00:06:18.560> there<00:06:18.740> are<00:06:18.830> a<00:06:18.860> lot<00:06:18.919> of 00:06:19.029 --> 00:06:19.039 align:start position:0% think it is because there are a lot of 00:06:19.039 --> 00:06:20.969 align:start position:0% think it is because there are a lot of elderly<00:06:19.490> patients<00:06:19.759> who<00:06:20.120> have 00:06:20.969 --> 00:06:20.979 align:start position:0% elderly patients who have 00:06:20.979 --> 00:06:22.870 align:start position:0% elderly patients who have uncharacteristic<00:06:21.979> symptoms<00:06:22.490> that<00:06:22.669> may 00:06:22.870 --> 00:06:22.880 align:start position:0% uncharacteristic symptoms that may 00:06:22.880 --> 00:06:24.430 align:start position:0% uncharacteristic symptoms that may include<00:06:23.150> breathlessness<00:06:23.719> and<00:06:23.870> if<00:06:24.169> they<00:06:24.289> have 00:06:24.430 --> 00:06:24.440 align:start position:0% include breathlessness and if they have 00:06:24.440 --> 00:06:26.290 align:start position:0% include breathlessness and if they have a<00:06:24.469> smoking<00:06:24.800> history<00:06:25.069> it's<00:06:25.580> becoming<00:06:26.180> very 00:06:26.290 --> 00:06:26.300 align:start position:0% a smoking history it's becoming very 00:06:26.300 --> 00:06:28.089 align:start position:0% a smoking history it's becoming very fashionable<00:06:26.960> say<00:06:27.139> they<00:06:27.319> probably<00:06:27.500> have<00:06:27.770> COPD 00:06:28.089 --> 00:06:28.099 align:start position:0% fashionable say they probably have COPD 00:06:28.099 --> 00:06:30.370 align:start position:0% fashionable say they probably have COPD and<00:06:28.580> then<00:06:29.240> you<00:06:29.330> start<00:06:29.569> treating<00:06:29.990> them<00:06:30.110> and 00:06:30.370 --> 00:06:30.380 align:start position:0% and then you start treating them and 00:06:30.380 --> 00:06:31.990 align:start position:0% and then you start treating them and although<00:06:30.560> we<00:06:30.889> know<00:06:31.009> our<00:06:31.219> treatments<00:06:31.819> are<00:06:31.940> safe 00:06:31.990 --> 00:06:32.000 align:start position:0% although we know our treatments are safe 00:06:32.000 --> 00:06:33.670 align:start position:0% although we know our treatments are safe and<00:06:32.509> all<00:06:32.599> that<00:06:32.779> you<00:06:32.960> don't<00:06:33.169> want<00:06:33.320> to<00:06:33.409> over 00:06:33.670 --> 00:06:33.680 align:start position:0% and all that you don't want to over 00:06:33.680 --> 00:06:35.889 align:start position:0% and all that you don't want to over treat<00:06:33.889> people<00:06:34.180> especially<00:06:35.180> not<00:06:35.270> the<00:06:35.509> elderly 00:06:35.889 --> 00:06:35.899 align:start position:0% treat people especially not the elderly 00:06:35.899 --> 00:06:38.300 align:start position:0% treat people especially not the elderly so<00:06:36.500> I<00:06:36.529> think<00:06:36.649> for<00:06:36.949> making<00:06:37.250> sure<00:06:37.460> that 00:06:38.300 --> 00:06:38.310 align:start position:0% so I think for making sure that 00:06:38.310 --> 00:06:40.040 align:start position:0% so I think for making sure that in<00:06:38.550> this<00:06:38.730> patient<00:06:39.150> it's<00:06:39.270> not<00:06:39.420> relevant<00:06:39.630> I 00:06:40.040 --> 00:06:40.050 align:start position:0% in this patient it's not relevant I 00:06:40.050 --> 00:06:41.900 align:start position:0% in this patient it's not relevant I don't<00:06:40.290> have<00:06:40.440> spirometry<00:06:40.800> but<00:06:41.430> I'm<00:06:41.550> happy<00:06:41.880> with 00:06:41.900 --> 00:06:41.910 align:start position:0% don't have spirometry but I'm happy with 00:06:41.910 --> 00:06:43.580 align:start position:0% don't have spirometry but I'm happy with what<00:06:42.210> I<00:06:42.240> have<00:06:42.540> I<00:06:42.690> thought<00:06:43.080> that<00:06:43.260> was<00:06:43.380> a<00:06:43.410> good 00:06:43.580 --> 00:06:43.590 align:start position:0% what I have I thought that was a good 00:06:43.590 --> 00:06:45.290 align:start position:0% what I have I thought that was a good answer<00:06:43.650> as<00:06:43.950> well<00:06:44.100> I<00:06:44.160> like<00:06:44.460> that<00:06:44.670> one<00:06:44.820> yes<00:06:45.090> yes 00:06:45.290 --> 00:06:45.300 align:start position:0% answer as well I like that one yes yes 00:06:45.300 --> 00:06:49.190 align:start position:0% answer as well I like that one yes yes children<00:06:46.139> wait<00:06:47.419> it's<00:06:48.419> not<00:06:48.600> telling<00:06:48.960> us<00:06:49.050> about 00:06:49.190 --> 00:06:49.200 align:start position:0% children wait it's not telling us about 00:06:49.200 --> 00:06:51.230 align:start position:0% children wait it's not telling us about the<00:06:49.530> disease<00:06:49.889> is<00:06:50.130> moving<00:06:50.700> the<00:06:50.820> measurement 00:06:51.230 --> 00:06:51.240 align:start position:0% the disease is moving the measurement 00:06:51.240 --> 00:06:52.970 align:start position:0% the disease is moving the measurement into<00:06:51.419> patient<00:06:51.930> groups<00:06:52.139> who<00:06:52.500> we<00:06:52.650> couldn't 00:06:52.970 --> 00:06:52.980 align:start position:0% into patient groups who we couldn't 00:06:52.980 --> 00:06:55.730 align:start position:0% into patient groups who we couldn't measure<00:06:53.130> before<00:06:53.430> yes<00:06:53.910> and<00:06:54.150> then<00:06:54.720> I<00:06:54.990> would<00:06:55.500> like 00:06:55.730 --> 00:06:55.740 align:start position:0% measure before yes and then I would like 00:06:55.740 --> 00:06:59.510 align:start position:0% measure before yes and then I would like a<00:06:55.980> test<00:06:56.340> that<00:06:56.880> seemed<00:06:57.540> more<00:06:58.010> attractive<00:06:59.010> to 00:06:59.510 --> 00:06:59.520 align:start position:0% a test that seemed more attractive to 00:06:59.520 --> 00:07:02.900 align:start position:0% a test that seemed more attractive to GPS<00:07:00.000> and<00:07:00.330> so<00:07:01.110> none<00:07:01.470> pulmonologist<00:07:02.250> who<00:07:02.490> don't 00:07:02.900 --> 00:07:02.910 align:start position:0% GPS and so none pulmonologist who don't 00:07:02.910 --> 00:07:05.180 align:start position:0% GPS and so none pulmonologist who don't do<00:07:03.120> spirometry<00:07:03.510> and<00:07:04.050> I<00:07:04.440> think<00:07:04.650> it<00:07:04.800> is 00:07:05.180 --> 00:07:05.190 align:start position:0% do spirometry and I think it is 00:07:05.190 --> 00:07:07.460 align:start position:0% do spirometry and I think it is overcoming<00:07:06.030> that<00:07:06.150> actually<00:07:06.540> you<00:07:06.630> have<00:07:06.810> to 00:07:07.460 --> 00:07:07.470 align:start position:0% overcoming that actually you have to 00:07:07.470 --> 00:07:09.260 align:start position:0% overcoming that actually you have to make<00:07:07.650> first<00:07:07.980> explorations<00:07:08.790> where<00:07:09.000> you<00:07:09.090> have 00:07:09.260 --> 00:07:09.270 align:start position:0% make first explorations where you have 00:07:09.270 --> 00:07:11.840 align:start position:0% make first explorations where you have to<00:07:09.540> shout<00:07:10.320> a<00:07:10.350> patient's<00:07:11.010> so<00:07:11.220> make<00:07:11.400> sure<00:07:11.640> they 00:07:11.840 --> 00:07:11.850 align:start position:0% to shout a patient's so make sure they 00:07:11.850 --> 00:07:13.520 align:start position:0% to shout a patient's so make sure they do<00:07:11.910> the<00:07:12.120> right<00:07:12.270> thing<00:07:12.540> I<00:07:12.690> don't<00:07:13.169> think<00:07:13.230> health 00:07:13.520 --> 00:07:13.530 align:start position:0% do the right thing I don't think health 00:07:13.530 --> 00:07:15.380 align:start position:0% do the right thing I don't think health professionals<00:07:14.130> like<00:07:14.490> being<00:07:14.940> mean<00:07:15.150> to 00:07:15.380 --> 00:07:15.390 align:start position:0% professionals like being mean to 00:07:15.390 --> 00:07:17.690 align:start position:0% professionals like being mean to patients<00:07:15.900> I<00:07:16.020> hope<00:07:16.290> not<00:07:16.470> at<00:07:16.680> least<00:07:16.800> and<00:07:17.520> that's 00:07:17.690 --> 00:07:17.700 align:start position:0% patients I hope not at least and that's 00:07:17.700 --> 00:07:19.550 align:start position:0% patients I hope not at least and that's why<00:07:17.850> if<00:07:18.150> we<00:07:18.210> had<00:07:18.600> a<00:07:18.630> test<00:07:18.930> that<00:07:19.200> was<00:07:19.350> more 00:07:19.550 --> 00:07:19.560 align:start position:0% why if we had a test that was more 00:07:19.560 --> 00:07:21.020 align:start position:0% why if we had a test that was more acceptable<00:07:20.010> I<00:07:20.220> think<00:07:20.430> we<00:07:20.669> would<00:07:20.790> do<00:07:20.910> much 00:07:21.020 --> 00:07:21.030 align:start position:0% acceptable I think we would do much 00:07:21.030 --> 00:07:23.120 align:start position:0% acceptable I think we would do much better<00:07:21.360> and<00:07:21.630> it's<00:07:21.870> a<00:07:21.990> very<00:07:22.200> good<00:07:22.350> point<00:07:22.590> I<00:07:22.950> hope 00:07:23.120 --> 00:07:23.130 align:start position:0% better and it's a very good point I hope 00:07:23.130 --> 00:07:24.860 align:start position:0% better and it's a very good point I hope you'll<00:07:23.280> get<00:07:23.430> there<00:07:23.669> we<00:07:24.000> weren't<00:07:24.240> quite<00:07:24.540> there 00:07:24.860 --> 00:07:24.870 align:start position:0% you'll get there we weren't quite there 00:07:24.870 --> 00:07:25.670 align:start position:0% you'll get there we weren't quite there yet 00:07:25.670 --> 00:07:25.680 align:start position:0% yet 00:07:25.680 --> 00:07:29.630 align:start position:0% yet so<00:07:26.460> to<00:07:27.060> summarize<00:07:27.620> Jurgen<00:07:28.620> and<00:07:28.800> I<00:07:28.860> both<00:07:29.370> feel 00:07:29.630 --> 00:07:29.640 align:start position:0% so to summarize Jurgen and I both feel 00:07:29.640 --> 00:07:32.690 align:start position:0% so to summarize Jurgen and I both feel that<00:07:29.750> that<00:07:30.750> the<00:07:31.050> f1<00:07:31.650> is<00:07:31.830> an<00:07:32.040> essential 00:07:32.690 --> 00:07:32.700 align:start position:0% that that the f1 is an essential 00:07:32.700 --> 00:07:36.770 align:start position:0% that that the f1 is an essential measurement<00:07:33.479> to<00:07:33.810> diagnose<00:07:34.350> COPD<00:07:35.389> but<00:07:36.389> it<00:07:36.540> has 00:07:36.770 --> 00:07:36.780 align:start position:0% measurement to diagnose COPD but it has 00:07:36.780 --> 00:07:38.750 align:start position:0% measurement to diagnose COPD but it has limited<00:07:37.470> application<00:07:38.220> in<00:07:38.340> routine 00:07:38.750 --> 00:07:38.760 align:start position:0% limited application in routine 00:07:38.760 --> 00:07:41.629 align:start position:0% limited application in routine management<00:07:39.300> after<00:07:39.780> that<00:07:39.960> we're<00:07:40.830> both<00:07:41.010> quite 00:07:41.629 --> 00:07:41.639 align:start position:0% management after that we're both quite 00:07:41.639 --> 00:07:44.090 align:start position:0% management after that we're both quite excited<00:07:42.270> about<00:07:42.419> the<00:07:42.900> use<00:07:43.050> of<00:07:43.320> new<00:07:43.650> techniques 00:07:44.090 --> 00:07:44.100 align:start position:0% excited about the use of new techniques 00:07:44.100 --> 00:07:46.820 align:start position:0% excited about the use of new techniques to<00:07:44.790> look<00:07:44.910> at<00:07:45.120> small<00:07:45.540> Airways<00:07:45.990> disease<00:07:46.020> much 00:07:46.820 --> 00:07:46.830 align:start position:0% to look at small Airways disease much 00:07:46.830 --> 00:07:49.130 align:start position:0% to look at small Airways disease much earlier<00:07:47.430> in<00:07:47.610> disease<00:07:47.970> development<00:07:48.540> that 00:07:49.130 --> 00:07:49.140 align:start position:0% earlier in disease development that 00:07:49.140 --> 00:07:51.950 align:start position:0% earlier in disease development that might<00:07:49.380> help<00:07:49.620> us<00:07:49.890> target<00:07:50.430> and<00:07:50.820> identify<00:07:51.600> new 00:07:51.950 --> 00:07:51.960 align:start position:0% might help us target and identify new 00:07:51.960 --> 00:07:54.140 align:start position:0% might help us target and identify new treatments<00:07:52.560> so<00:07:53.490> with<00:07:53.610> that<00:07:53.729> I'd<00:07:53.940> like<00:07:54.120> to 00:07:54.140 --> 00:07:54.150 align:start position:0% treatments so with that I'd like to 00:07:54.150 --> 00:07:56.060 align:start position:0% treatments so with that I'd like to thank<00:07:54.330> you<00:07:54.660> very<00:07:54.810> much<00:07:55.050> for<00:07:55.260> joining<00:07:55.320> us<00:07:55.800> and 00:07:56.060 --> 00:07:56.070 align:start position:0% thank you very much for joining us and 00:07:56.070 --> 00:07:58.070 align:start position:0% thank you very much for joining us and remember<00:07:56.100> there<00:07:56.850> will<00:07:57.060> be<00:07:57.090> more<00:07:57.479> reports<00:07:58.020> from 00:07:58.070 --> 00:07:58.080 align:start position:0% remember there will be more reports from 00:07:58.080 --> 00:08:00.469 align:start position:0% remember there will be more reports from the<00:07:58.320> eros<00:07:58.890> over<00:07:59.370> the<00:07:59.520> next<00:07:59.729> few<00:07:59.940> days 00:08:00.469 --> 00:08:00.479 align:start position:0% the eros over the next few days 00:08:00.479 --> 00:08:03.260 align:start position:0% the eros over the next few days thank<00:08:00.750> you<00:08:00.870> very<00:08:00.900> much